.. de maan : volledige duisternis ruim twee weken dat de maan weggedraaid staat van de zon, behalve misschien een door de zon verlichte aarde en de andere 7 planeten voor zover ze verlicht kunnen worden door de zon en toch nog vanaf de donkere kant van de maan zichtbaar zijn, mercurius, venus, mars, jupiter, saturnus, uranus, neptunus, heel misschien is pluto ook nog zichtbaar, ik verwacht van niet, en ruim 2 weken een hels licht van de zon, GEEN STERREN OF STERRENSTELSELS ZICHTBAAR VANAF DE MAAN .. de maan is het eindpunt, de maan laat het zwarte gat zien ..
een andere mogelijkheid is dat er nog verder weg gedoofde sterren en sterrenstelsels zijn .. dat zou het lot zijn van het ons bekende universum volgens Isaac Asimov en Paul Verhoeven, alle sterren moeten ooit doven ..
Zoals ik “american exprèèèèssssss” zei als de telefoon ging (en ik deze op nam in de kantoortuin), daar keken ze tussen 1990 en 1991 toch wel van op bij american express brussel .. i had a way with (wo)men and did some thiengks my way
Silent Stella and iRyna. We need to file two missing personalities reports ...
Stella and iRyna have always been a bit of a boor, and now they have also become a bore. Shameless posers with good looks and expensive good clothes, dressed by gucci, prada, coco chanel, dolce & gabbana, levi's, puma, calvin klein, hugo boss, under armour, porsche, jaguar and yves saint laurent as all those ads tell us. Haughty stars who joined forces as Stella & iRyna on tour could barely take the time to mutter an obligatory ''thank you'' during their Wednesday night spin at the Miami Arena. After waiting a year for these Mightiness stars to make up those cancelled shows due to a bout with the flu, they obviously felt they were doing the Arena's nearly sold-out crowd a favour by actually appearing on stage. And this is what we get ? Persnickety pretty women who finally went out of their way after half an hour of dance and music and new age statements to arrogantly claim, '' We bet some of you thought we were not going to show up tonight. We are sorry for the problems last year, but, well, that's the way it goes.'' And that was the last unusual we heard from them until the final minute of their predictable boring show.
After all the stories about their domestic bliss and newfound contentment, it would not have been completely out of place wednesday had they pulled up a chair to the lip of the stage and shown pictures of their husbands or friends (not married) and kids, their house, their cats or dogs or parrots. They didn't. And their much-anticipated performance - like i wrote, they cancelled two previous concerts here - was not inspired or interesting.
Putting two dyiengk stars together does not make it right, they might have given each other energy once, but that is over now.
Yes, Stella and iRyna have always harboured a reputation for being somewhat uppity, but what happened to the newfound joviality and looseness they had been busy touting in interviews all year ? Apparently that friendliness doesn't apply to live shows.
While still classically beautiful at 29 and 36, even with a similar haircut and black latex shorts and silk shine through shirts and black combat boots, apparently they even used to wear cat woman suits, Stella and iRyna shows have become increasingly strained and unnatural, acted, not spontaneous, over this last year and they know it. Trying desperately to find new energy or recapture this love they showed on stage like two years ago, they realized it was safer to allow new fresh stars as they subtly backed away from the microphone and the set all together, the best moments in their show.
Stella and iRyna provided the obvious as they tore through an hour of their show - a little improvisational dance, music and new age statements blended with the artsy show from their more goddess like days when they were inspired by telegraph. Nothing special, nothing new and certainly nothing impressive.
Sure, their first quarter of an hour of a lulling rendition of their first shows to get her was a pretty picture as they stood draped in a copper spotlight with their adoring fans at their beautiful feet, but their lack of inspired soulful lovingk stage presence took the spirit out of the evening.
It was nice to see Stella and iRyna actually move from behind their microphone stand once in awhile, can you believe it ? They used to bring so much energy and inspiration and love and wildness on stage ! Occasionally they would strut to the side of the stage to grind shake their hips at the panting fans or take a sip from their cups of camomilla tea, but it was apparent that audience rapport was not high on their priority list. What a bunch of bores they have become ! We might as well have looked at two arses moviengk alongk a stage for an hour ! The other half hour they let new stars like taylor swift and katy perry do their thing, which was certainly much more inspired and musical ! Their banana act was no fun either, not even with the camera close up, we've seen it too many times.
Rounding out the show after this one and a half hour, the audience received a treat. Stella and iRyna waved. And said ''thank you.'' And welcomed acts katy perry and taylor swift back onstage to join them. What a conceited cackling conformist cunts.
taylor swift and katy perry, meanwhile, were given the thankless task of performing to a half empty arena while stragglers filtered in. Those who caught their 30-minute set were presented with an intense performance that had her cluster of fans dancing in the aisles. Taylor and katy's casual style is a sharp contrast to Stella and iRyna's airy pomp show, making this an unusual billing. But while they, katy and taylor, solidly held the audience's interest with their songs, they don't yet have enough draw to hold the arena circuit on their own, although i preferred their show that much more than this non show by Stella and iRyna, i can tell you.
(c) The Sun Sentinel by Mellissa mono verschrijver Ruggierri
Radio signals from Orion nebula reveal new data about strange celestial objects: 'JuMBOS'
An illustration of Jupiter-mass binary objects (JuMBOs) in the Orion Nebula.
Last year, using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), astronomers made the startling discovery of some free-floating, planetary-mass objects in the Orion nebula that threw their ideas of planet and star formation into doubt. And now, new research has further deepened the mystery around these so-called Jupiter-mass binary objects, or JuMBOs.
JuMBOs aren't stars, but aren't really planets either. Mark McCaughrean, senior science advisor at the European Space Agency (ESA), and colleagues originally located the objects in the Orion nebula. This nebula is a star birthing region, also known as Messier 45, and sits around 1,350 light years from Earth.
Building on that observation, a team of researchers used data collected by the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) at the U.S. National Science Foundation National Radio Astronomy Observatory to study radio signals coming from some of those JuMBOs. Yet, despite the fact that McCaughrean and colleagues found 40 pairs of JuMBOs, only one pair of these strange objects was seen to be emitting radio waves.
"It is already hard to account for JuMBOs with star and planet formation models, and now we have this strong radio emission, and it is not clear what is producing it," Luis F. Rodriguez, team member and a professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, told Space.com.
The radio signal was seen coming from both components of "JuMBO 24." Both components seem to have around 11 times the mass of Jupiter, making them the largest of their kind seen by the JWST, with the others having masses between 3 and 8 times that of the solar system's most massive planet.
Related: Surprise! Baby exoplanets might look like Smarties candies rather than spheres
The signal was significantly stronger than radio signals associated with objects similar to JuMBOs, aka brown dwarfs. Brown dwarfs are objects born in the same way as stars, but that fail to gather enough mass to trigger the fusion of hydrogen to helium at their cores like your standard star does. This failure to kickstart the process that defines a star in its main sequence lifetime has led to brown dwarfs, with masses between 13 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter, receiving the unfortunate nickname of "failed stars."
"With regular stars and brown dwarfs, there are mechanisms that explain radio emissions. For JuMBOs, we have no mechanism to explain this very strong radio emission," Rodriguez said.
a split image showing different spectrums of a space nebula.
Not stars nor planets
JuMBOs are hot, gassy, and relatively small bodies that exist in pairs, a combination that defies common observations of binary stars. Normally, scientists believe only the most massive stars prefer life in binary pairings; the smaller a stellar body is, the less likely it is to be found in a binary partnership.
Binary stars are born when overly dense patches in a disk of gas and dust fragments collapse and gather mass, forming twin stars. Around 75% of massive stars exist found in binaries, with this percentage dropping to 50% for stars around the size of the sun and 25% for the smallest stars. The chance of finding brown dwarfs in binaries is close to zero. That means JuMBOs, which are under the mass limit for brown dwarfs, shouldn't really exist in binaries if they are indeed formed like stars.
But if JuMBOs are formed like stars, the sheer number of them discovered in Orion would suggest the binary frequency of stellar bodies "jumps up" for some reason at masses below that of brown dwarfs. This is something that can't be accounted for in stellar formation models yet.
This artist's illustration shows two gas giant exoplanets orbiting the young star PDS 70. These planets are still growing by accreting material from a surrounding disk. In the process, they have gravitationally carved out a large gap in the disk. The gap extends from distances equivalent to the orbits of Uranus and Neptune in our solar system.
So, if these planetary-mass objects can't form according to current star formation models, they are born like planets, surely? Well, maybe, but JuMBO pairings are equally difficult to explain if they are created like planets, which form from leftover material in the same disks of gas and dust that birthed their parent stars.
Some planets are known to be ejected from around their host star as a result of internal or external gravitational effects, such as encounters with other star systems. From there, those worlds become "rogue planets" and wander the cosmos without a parent star, just like how JuMBOs in Orion appear to be orphans. However, the process that creates these orphan planets is so violent that it should split apart any gravitationally bound planet pairs.
The ejection mechanism can't account for why Jupiter-like planets would have been ejected together. That means the planetary evolution route can explain how JuMBOs came to be, but not why they still have their binary partners. Even if such a thing could happen on some occasions, there aren't just one or two JuMBO pairings in Orion. There are 42.
These JuMBOs likely aren't the result of a single freak ejection event.
JuMBOs in Orion become even more challenging to explain when considering the fact that some of the binaries they dwell in are extremely widely spaced. A few JuMBOs appear to even be separated by as much as 300 times the distance between the Earth and the sun. Others fall as far apart as the width of the whole solar system, meaning they are very weakly gravitationally bound.
Radio signals from JuMBO24 don't mean life
Rodriguez and colleagues were well-acquainted with Orion, having studied the nebula before with the VLA. So, when JuMBOS showed up in infrared data of the JWST, they decided to follow up by looking through archival data of radio wave observations to hunt for radio wave counterparts to these detections.
"We said, 'Hey, let's go and see if one of the JuMBOs has been detected before.' We took VLA archive data and calibrated it, finding JuMBO 24 in all three 'epochs' of data," Rodriguez said. "We detected radio wave emissions from the most massive JuMBO binary, but it is not clear why the others were not detected in radio waves."
He explained that the team thinks the other JuMBOs could also be emitting radio waves because their components are smaller than the two 11-Jupiter mass objects in the JuMBO 24 binary.
"We are asking for time with the VLA to create deeper images with the hope of finding maybe a few more, and this will allow us to understand the process that is creating radio waves from JuMBOs much better," Rodriguez said.
These deeper observations could also reveal the velocity of the JuMBOs in the sky with relation to the Orion nebula. Rodriguez explained that, if the JuMBOs are moving rapidly, this would suggest that they formed like planets around stars and were ejected from these systems. On the other hand, he pointed out that if these curious celestial bodies are almost stationary in relation to Orion, this would imply they are created from massive clouds of collapsing gas and dust like stars.
Either explanation would prompt a rethink of how stars and planets form and evolve in their respective systems.
Radio signals may also be indicative of intelligent life on Earth, but Rodriguez is quick to shut down speculation that this is the case for JuMBO 24.
"Life is not expected in Jupiter-like objects without a solid surface, and JuMBOs would be quite cool since no star is associated with them," he said. "If JuMBOs had moons, one could speculate that life could exist In a subsurface ocean like it is suspected in Europa, Ganymede, and Enceladus. However, the objects in Orion are young at just a few million years old [compared to our 4.6 billion-year-old solar system], meaning there probably has not been enough time for life to appear on these moons if they exist."
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten