Tjezis, wat ben ik in een stom kut verhaal terecht gekomen, zeg 😿😸😻🙀😽😺 …. Zo wil je echt je pa sien, zoals hier van ondere , bye Eline ......... Theo Tjepkema uit Lochem, Barchem waarvan se frau Willy net overleden is .... doet hem verdriet, maar hij overleeft eT (nog) well, die ene zekerheid hebbe we in eT leefe, we gaan dood, morsdood, GEEN hiernamaals, dan is eT compleet over, misschien maar goed ook als je ziet hoe de wereld er door die verrotte verwaande verwende dooie weife~lulle aan toe is . ...... Heerlijk in de blote kont, nee, maar heeeeeer lijk in de blote kont ! (citaat Kees van Kooten) .. Misschien ben ik met de yoga en andere training bij sport city new babylon (ook of vooral de top traint daar of geeft daar les, dat vooral, jesis grijst) over 3 maanden ook zo’n goddess cat, ha, dan kan ik zelfs Nicole aan ..
iT's never about the goal, iT's about the journey and experiences that shape you through(out) life
life is the way you think about yourself through the day (wim de bie & kees van kooten)
2026 gaat eT gebeure ( ? )
naar de maan
en terug
to the moon
and back, ze hebbe het over december 2026 naar de zuid pool van de maan, dat wordt in ieder geval 2027, ze moeten bovendien een space x raket van elon musk hebben, laten we hopen op 2028 en dat trump dan dood is en george clooney en michelle obama president van de us of a zijn ? Waarom zou een (knap) acteur een goed president zijn ? Hij lijkt me beter dan biden en hij is beter dan trump, meer stemmen ook ..... ..
iT is not possible to see stars from the moon, stars are NOT visible from the moon, get that through your ugly greedy stupid animal farm mammon pig-rat-dog-chicken plague head.
Humans will never be able to live on mars --> sievert-radiation, more than 6 months travel, not possible to create a lunar base and certainly impossible to create a mars base where humans can live, they would not last longer than 2 days on mars, but they will never be able to get there , two stupid impossible remarks in one article, which i will therefore no longer read
ãïTëT & mano verschrijver , i think elon musk is no good, no real understanding, he is thomas edison, spending billions butt not knowingk what the narcistisc little shit is doing~k , looking for a needle in a hay-stack
Astronauts explain why no human has visited the moon in 50 years — and the reasons why are depressing
The last time a person visited the moon was in December 1972, during NASA's Apollo 17 mission.
Astronauts say the reasons why are budgetary and political, not scientific or technical.
It's possible NASA could land people on the moon again by 2025, at the very earliest.
Landing 12 people on the moon remains one of NASA's greatest achievements, if not the greatest.
Astronauts on the Apollo missions of the 1960s and '70s collected rocks, took photos, performed experiments, planted flags, and then came home. But those stays didn't establish a lasting human presence on the moon.
More than 50 years after the most recent crewed moon landing — Apollo 17 in December 1972 — there are plenty of reasons to return people to Earth's giant, dusty satellite and stay there.
Former NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, who ran the agency during the Trump administration, said it's not science or technology hurdles that have held the US back from doing this sooner.
"If it wasn't for the political risk, we would be on the moon right now," Bridenstine said on a phone call with reporters in 2018. "In fact, we would probably be on Mars."
So why haven't astronauts been back to the moon in more than 50 years?
"It was the political risks that prevented it from happening," Bridenstine said. "The program took too long and it costs too much money."
Researchers and entrepreneurs have long pushed for the creation of a crewed base on the moon — a lunar space station.
"A permanent human research station on the moon is the next logical step. It's only three days away. We can afford to get it wrong and not kill everybody," Chris Hadfield, a former astronaut, previously told Insider. "And we have a whole bunch of stuff we have to invent and then test in order to learn before we can go deeper out."
Plus, NASA's budget is somewhat small relative to its past.
"NASA's portion of the federal budget peaked at 4% in 1965," Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Cunningham said during congressional testimony in 2015.
To compare, NASA's 2023 budget represents roughly 0.5% of US spending, according to a report from the Planetary Society. It has fluctuated between 0.4% and 1% since the 1970s, the report said.
Returning to the moon costs a significant chunk of that budget. A 2021 report from NASA estimated that the Artemis program to return people to the moon would cost a total of $93 billion from 2012 through 2025.
The Apollo program, for comparison, cost about $257 billion in today's dollars.
"Manned exploration is the most expensive space venture and, consequently, the most difficult for which to obtain political support," Cunningham said during his 2015 testimony.
He added, according to Scientific American: "Unless the country, which is Congress here, decided to put more money in it, this is just talk that we're doing here."
Referring to Mars missions and a return to the moon, Cunningham said, "NASA's budget is way too low to do all the things that we've talked about."
The problem with presidents
Trump didn't scrap SLS. But he did change Obama's goal of launching astronauts to an asteroid, shifting priorities to moon and Mars missions. Trump wanted to see Artemis land astronauts back on the moon in 2024.
Such frequent changes to NASA's expensive priorities have led to cancellation after cancellation, a loss of about $20 billion, and years of wasted time and momentum.
Biden seems to be a rare exception to the shifty presidential trend: he hasn't toyed with Trump's Artemis priority for NASA, and he's also kept the Space Force intact.
Buzz Aldrin said in testimony to Congress in 2015 that he believes the will to return to the moon must come from Capitol Hill.
"American leadership is inspiring the world by consistently doing what no other nation is capable of doing. We demonstrated that for a brief time 45 years ago. I do not believe we have done it since," Aldrin wrote in a statement. "I believe it begins with a bipartisan congressional and administration commitment to sustained leadership."
The real driving force behind that government commitment to return to the moon is the will of the American people, who vote for politicians and help shape their policy priorities. But public interest in lunar exploration has always been lukewarm.
Many space enthusiasts have long hoped to build a base on the moon, but the lunar surface's harsh environment wouldn't be an ideal place for humans to thrive.NASA
The challenges beyond politics include problematic regolith and eye-popping temperature fluctuations
The political tug-of-war over NASA's mission and budget isn't the only reason people haven't returned to the moon. The moon is also a 4.5-billion-year-old death trap for humans and must not be trifled with or underestimated.
Its surface is littered with craters and boulders that threaten safe landings. The US government spent what would be tens of billions in today's dollars to develop, launch, and deliver satellites to the moon to map its surface, and help mission planners scout for possible Apollo landing sites.
But a bigger worry is what eons of meteorite impacts have created: regolith, also called moon dust.
Following the Apollo missions, scientists quarantined the astronauts for two weeks after they landed, in part because they were worried about the effects of the dust, according to a 2022 NASA study. The fine powder that sits on the moon's surface stuck to their suits, vehicles, and even got inside their spacecraft.
Peggy Whitson, an astronaut who has spent 675 days in space, previously told Insider that the Apollo missions "had a lot of problems with dust."
"If we're going to spend long durations and build permanent habitats, we have to figure out how to handle that," Whitson said.
For about 14 days at a time, the side of the moon facing Earth is a boiling hellscape that is exposed directly to the sun's harsh rays; the moon has very little atmosphere, and therefore no protection against solar radiation.
The next 14 days that same side is in total darkness, dipping to temperatures below -200 degrees Fahrenheit, making the moon's surface one of the colder places in the solar system.
NASA is developing a fission power system that could supply astronauts with electricity during weeks-long lunar nights — which would also be useful on other worlds, including Mars.
"There is not a more environmentally unforgiving or harsher place to live than the moon," astronautical engineer Madhu Thangavelu wrote. "And yet, since it is so close to the Earth, there is not a better place to learn how to live, away from planet Earth."
NASA has designed dust- and sun-resistant spacesuits and rovers, though it's uncertain whether that equipment is anywhere near ready to launch.
"I already knew going to the moon was hard," Reid Weisman, Artemis II Mission Commander, said at a press conference in August 2023. "But boy, it's harder than I thought."
This is not just Apollo 18': Artemis geology team prepares for astronaut exploration on Moon's South Pole
Emilee Speck
Unlike the Apollo missions exploring sunlit areas of the Moon, the Artemis astronauts will be landing in the shadowed region of the lunar South Pole, offering new challenges for exploration.
"This is going to be very different than Apollo. This is not just Apollo 18. This is a completely different way of getting there, and the exploration strategies will be different, and the science goals will be different," said Dr. Lauren Edgar, the deputy principal investigator for the Artemis III geology team.
NASA recently selected a team to develop a science plan for the Artemis III mission, the first astronaut moon landing in over 50 years. Artemis III Geology Principal Investigator Dr. Brett Denevi, with Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, will lead a team of diverse experts to identify key strategies and science goals for the astronaut mission to the Moon. NASA is targeting late 2025 for the Artemis III moon landing, which is dependent on the Artemis II mission around the Moon late next year.
As a planetary scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey, Edgar has worked with astronauts practicing geology fieldwork on Earth and robotic missions like NASA’s Mars Curiosity rover.
"We're going to the South Pole because we're really interested in volatiles, the things that would vaporize easily in the presence of sunlight. So water, things like that, and the different ices that we might expect to find there," Edgar said. "That will tell us a lot about the evolution of volatiles in the solar system in general."
Water ice is a crucial reason why NASA has selected 13 possible landing regions on the Moon’s South Pole. NASA and its international partners hope to use water on the Moon to make fuel and drinking water.
Depending on the launch window and the need to land in sunlight, engineering constraints may play the most significant role in picking where the Artemis III landing happens. However, all 13 regions will provide astronauts access to important geological findings.
"Those 13 regions all have similar access to impact ejecta from a really old impact crater that might tell us a lot about the early formation of the Moon, access to locations where you might expect to see volatiles, anywhere we can kind of do some of the space weathering analysis that we're interested in," Edgar said. "There'll be differences in the geology, but broadly, all 13 give you some access to different parts of that."
Ahead of the astronauts, NASA has payloads on several private robotic missions that will help the geology team identify where those volatiles are distributed and what the astronauts might experience when they arrive. The types of rocks found and collected by astronauts on the South Pole will be unlike any of the samples brought back from the Apollo program.
Edgar and her colleagues will try to create a science game plan that will help the astronauts prepare for exploring another world.
"Doing geology on other planets is really challenging," Edgar said.
Astronauts will have to navigate on the Moon and understand where they are relative to different lunar features. Edgar said lighting will be challenging because the South Pole is primarily in darkness.
"Being there on the surface, they're going to have terrain challenges in terms of boulders and impact craters and hazards they need to try and avoid. You also have to bring your entire life support system with you on your back. So navigating around in the suit with the tools, all of that will be challenging," Edgar said.
NASA astronauts typically receive three phases of geology training. Phase one begins as an astronaut candidate, and then when they are selected, NASA astronauts undergo in-field expeditions, gaining the skill set needed for geology.
"Phase three is mission specific. So once that Artemis III crew is named, and we know at least a couple of the landing sites that might be options for them, you can do more specific training geared towards (those sites)," Edgar said.
Scientists will help the astronauts understand their landing area and what they might see, including what types of observations and samples are needed.
Once the landing sites are narrowed down, astronauts can undergo more training on Earth with analogs replicating the conditions they could see on the lunar South Pole.
Analogs for the Moon and Mars are located all over the world.
"Flagstaff, Arizona, where the U.S. Geological Survey is, is a great spot for training, a place that we've done a lot, And also the reason why our center exists in Flagstaff was for training the Apollo astronauts back in the sixties," Edgar said.
Edgar said that analog astronauts practice for Mars missions near the Kilauea volcano in Hawaii and Iceland is another common analog for the Moon and Mars.
NASA's ultimate goal is to establish a sustainable presence on the Moon and eventually Mars. Edgar says in-situ resource utilization, or using planetary resources, will help further exploration strategies for Mars.
"All of the technology that's needed to get there, the exploration strategies, is kind of that concept of operations and procedures that we can test out the infrastructure that is needed to support humans and the in-situ resource utilization. What can we use in place that we don't have to bring with us?" Edgar said. "Those are all things that will help us eventually bring humans to Mars."
De beste voorspellende supercomputer van Europa zegt dat we er niets tegen kunnen doen ..... slacht offer ....slacht offer ....
Een van de grootste massale sterftes die de aarde ooit heeft gekend, zal volgens een krachtige supercomputer aan het einde van deze eeuw plaatsvinden.
iT comes in waves eT
Was eefe boodschappe doen bij de jumbo en de albert heijn, reed er veel te dichtbij een agressieve volkswagen voorbij, 800 meter verderop stopte hij, ik maakte al boze grom geluiden, toen dat slappe losertje met se kutkippekoppie uit stapte kon ik het niet laten, "agressief krrrrreng !" , riep ik.
Dat sielige kleine pikkie (volgens brigitte kaandorp zijn het pinkeltjes, kleine pikkies, agressieve rijdertjes in autootjes en daar heeft ze 99% gelijk in) riep iets sieligs terug, waarop ik volledig los kon gaan. God Verrrrrdomme, miezerige misbaksel met se kutte autootje. Ik ben helemaal niet agressief, maar ik werd zo boos en kwaad als in 2018-2020 op die goorste smerigste misbaksels, vooral dat vieze vieze zure rotkopje barbie van de griend, dat kleine smerige sielige bekkie, moest ook denken aan toen ik met mijn dochter Eline van 3 jaar door de vogelwijk (1 van de chiqueste en rustigste wijken van den haag) fietste en weer een volkswagen rijder agressief aan het toeteren was en veel gas gaf, smerig sielig pikkie, hoop dat je daarna onder helse pijnen na 8 jaar lijden gestorven bent. Dat hoop ik ook en ik spreek hierbij die vloek uit over politie sergeantje schijt ventje danny van mariahoeve, 1 jaar in de gevangenis en nooit meer een functie bij de politie of de nederlandse overheid, RRRRRRROT op met die goorste smerigste lafste nsb varkenskutkop ......
Mijn pa had 2-3 jaar een volkswagen passat, top auto, hij was er zeer tevreden mee, toen reed se soon keesjan die auto in de prak, perte total, total loss, daarna toyota top, toen volvo voorloper v70, matig, daarna alleen nog maar toyota, se frau ook...... ik rij geen auto meer en ben daar blij mee, hoewel ik helemaal gek was op de hyundai tucson silver line leather black heated seats 2005....... met die tesla auto's voel ik ook een vreemde aversie, ik mag die narcistische blaaskaak elon musk niet als ik de dood rrrratchie anubis, mano verschrijver en menno van veenendaal ben ...... in het begin vond ik het de mooiste auto's, nu helemaal niet meer, nooit een tesla ..... hyundai, kia en toyota zijn favoriet ...... en aiways of so, die auto van ines, gekozen door haar zeer zeer slimme, intelligente zoon. .... de jaguar ipace vond-vind ik ook schitterend tot een collega vertelde dat die een bereik heeft van ruim 300 kilometer en heerlijk rijdt ....... 300 kilometer, dan ben je net over de duitse grens en dan moet je zoeken naar een oplaadpaal en in zuid-europa of frankrijk zijn die er nauwelijks.
Windturbines op alle vervoer- en transportmiddelen, zet er 8 op een auto en deze heeft nooit meer benzine, diesel, olie of elektriciteit nodig, de 8 windturbines en de 4 roterende wielen maken voldoende elektriciteit aan plus die ene goede elestor waterstof batterij in de auto, het schip, de boot, de trein, de vrachtwagen en we zijn gered. Geen olie 💀, geen plastic💀, geen kolen💀, geen kernenergie💀, geen gas, zichzelf voort bewegende volvo vervoermiddelen en de rest met wind-, zonne, water, zwaartekracht en andere elektriciteit-waterstof energie, kernfusie misschien, maxqwell's multi demoned rotating magnetic tesla field mogelijk, ja, dat is voldoende voor 2024-2400 .....DAN REDDEN WE eT.
Wat uit sich selluf groeit is vaak net zo mooi of mooier als~dan gekochte spulle :
Vermoed dat dit de dochter van Aska is ....... vlakbij astrid neff terecht gekomen waarvan ik vermoedde dat haar man, gerd neff, bijna cfo mercedes, daimler een relatie met aska had, maar dat is zeer onzeker, er was daar wel iets vreemds loos, aska was eerst 4-6 weken weg, toen 1 week terug en nu is ze weer 9 weken weg, dat wil zeggen dat haar mooie rood-zwarte mini 9 weken ongebruikt in het statenkwartier staat, ze werkt nu als director bij nevomo, magrail, am ster dam, jaja (pools voor eieren foor je geld kiezen) allemaal leuk en aardig, die hyperloop, zeeeeeer kostbaar, windturbines op treinen~locomotieven en ze rijden gratis, zonder energie, wel constructie kosten ...... well nobody listens to a word i say, i guess you call it self inflicted isolation suicide, well i'm too fool to swallow ehm ehm i don't have any pride, just being happy and strong (most of the time solo like every body) is my life now
maar die onderstaande nevomo site is interessant en lijkt me te hoog gegrepen, wind turbines is beter ? !
Het is niet te geloven hoe nauw interne en externe kracht samen hangen, gestimuleerd door wiet, psy-truffels en psy paddestoelen en de beste yoga goddessess meesteressen, dit is moeilijk uit te leggen
eT is zoals eT isseuh
ik word nooit een epke zonderland (hoeft ook niet), een nieuwe eT achtige Rudolf mano verschrijver äï Nurejev zou ik wel wille met me blote bille
Ja, dat is nou jammer, ik heb niemand om een foto van me blote bille te make
The Police bassist asked the crowd if they were cold, and not wanting to convey that he was not, declared ''Ich bin warm,'' to blank looks all round. Sting had just told 7,000 people ''I am gay.'' Zo zei john f. kennedy in een beroemde toespraak "ich bin ein berliner !" : "ik ben een oliebol !"
A faux pas reminiscent of President Carter's declaration that he wanted to go to bed with the entire population of Poland. Lovely.
Meanwhile, Sting was basking in his Messiah's role. ''You are the salt of the earth,'' he told us, beaming down from on high. And, with a scene-stealing hound launching a one dog invasion of the stage, the show went out with 'So Lonely' and the inevitable choruses of Eeyo Eeeyo Eeyayo's, the animal scampering around the bassist's feet and adding his own comments.
It was a nice goofy conclusion, and raised a few smiles, even in the sloping rain.
But I smiled most at the realisation that there would not be any more open air pop festivals this year. No more Gordon Sumner Nights of sub-zero temperatures.
.png)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten