Vind het ook mooi, zeker met de uitleg van Mark erbij. Ik werd gegrepen en was gefascineerd door onderstaande van Karel Appel, zo ongelooflijk mooi, ik bekeek eT eerst liggend (zie foto) en Mark zette (zuchtend, niet waar, verschryf ik voor het verhaal) het schilderij goed voor mijn neus neer. Voor de mammon lijers onder ons, bovenstaande litho kost 500 EUR, onderstaande kost 100 EUR, voor mij weer zo’n 10.000 tot 1 miljoen eur schilderij, stendhal shockje..syndroom..

“Het is een dier,” zei Mark, ja, dat zie ik ook, maar wat voor dier. Dat is mij niet bekend. Ik zie er een konijn of een wolf in. Ja, het is een agressief dier. Toch ook zacht door die schitterende kleuren, de vlag van Oekraïne, zie ook de 2 schilderijen van Van Dongen hierboven en hoeveel kunstenaars momenteel de kleuren blauw en geel gebruiken. Vind kunstenaars op het eerste gezicht zoveel mooiere mensen dan ambtenaren, "bedrijfswerkers", werknemers en werkgevers en vooral onderstaande negatief genoemden.

(alweer door ãï 🙀😱 getiept !)

APOLLO~~ARTEMIS~~ORION

TO THE MOON, THE STARS AND BEYOND

alle rechters in de us of a zijn politiek benoemd, al net zo twijfelachtig als de hollandse methode van selectie, van barbie tottie 1940-1945, wat werkten de rechters en burgemeesters mee met de duitse bezetter, we hebben onze mooie baantjes en die willen we houden, de varrrrekeuhs oranje nassau waren gevlucht naar canada om in alle comfort en luxe daar 5 jaar te blijven, zo'n naïeve gelovige domme achter lijke bloementeler stuurde jaarlijks voor 10.000 EUR en meer bloemen naar canada daarom 😱😱😱😱🙀🙀🙀🙀

waarom geeft niemand die gore smerige hebberige bezitterige mammonkankerlijers pest varkens oranja nassau een welverdiende trap voor dat volgevreten verwaande doodzieke achterste ? oprrrrrrrotten uit een beschaafd welvarend land dat staat voor vrijheid, gelijkwaardigheid en sociale solidariteit en een eerlijke herverdeling van middelen, niet gebaseerd op een duister oorlogszuchtig moordend verleden met dienstmeiden voor de voortzetting van dat geleuvige gelovige kuttenkoningshuis, en jonkheer de ranitz met se twee stupide zonen in breda die het zaad aan wilhelmina leverde voor juliana. "Ze" wanen zich de plaatsvervangers van god op aarde, vooral benard von lippe biesterfielt en se varkensdochter beatriks hadden en hebben die neiging. Veel rechters wanen zich met dat (ver)oordelen ook god(in), de verwaande verrotte verstarde dode lijke ijdelheid, de stupiditeit, de achter lijk heid, het is niet te geloven, eT is niet te geloven

ãîTëT

Planet survives catastrophic end of its solar system. How did it escape destruction?

Mark Price

Wed, September 20, 2023 at 9:36 PM GMT+2·2 min read

A large planet 530 light years away from Earth is mystifying scientists because it has somehow proved to be indestructible in the worst of circumstances, NASA says.

4 lichtjaar is met de huidige stand der techniek 80.000 jaar reizen voor de mensheid en in de snelheid zit "al" sinds de lancering van voyager 1 en 2 geen "vooruitgang" , we kunnen niet sneller, 530 licht jaar is dus ruim 10 miljoen jaar reizen voor de mens.

Called 8 Ursae Minoris b, it is orbiting a star “in its death throes,” which is the biblical end of days for a solar system.

However, 8 Ursae Minoris b continues to exist, as if a giant force field protects it from being ripped apart.

“(As) a swollen red giant, the star would have been expected to expand beyond the planet’s orbit before receding to its present (still giant) size,” NASA said in Sept. 19 report.

“In other words, the star would have engulfed and ripped apart any planets orbiting closely around it. Yet the planet remains in a stable, nearly circular orbit.”

So far, scientists have not settled on an explanation, though they have theories.

Among the possibilities are the planet is the offspring of “a stellar merger that either altered the evolution of the host star or produced 8 Ursae Minoris b as a second-generation planet,” according to a 2023 research paper published in Nature.com.

That means, the planet either survived the merger of two stars, or it was created when the gust and gas kicked up by the merger coalesced into a new planet, NASA says.

The planet, composed mainly of gas, has a mass equal to 1.31 Jupiters and takes just 93 days to orbit its star, NASA says. It was discovered in 2015.

“The discovery of this seemingly impossible situation ... shows that planet formation — and destruction — are likely far more intricate and unpredictable than many scientists might have thought,” NASA reported.

Stars expand into red giants as they “exhaust their nuclear fuel” and reach the end of their lifespan, scientists say. This swelling engulfs orbiting planets.

It’s a process that will happen to the Sun in 6 billion years, scientists say.

NEEN, OVER 5 MILJARD JAAR, 5 BILLION YEARS EN IN TEGENSTELLING TOT WAT HIERONDER BEWEERD WORDT, WORDT DE AARDE GEGARANDEERD COMPLEET VERBRAND DOOR DE ZON DIE OPZWELT TOT AAN MARS, MISSCHIEN EEN LUCIFER VOOR DE GASPLANETEN JUPITER, SATURNUS, NEPTUNUS EN URANUS, DAN "HEB" JE EEN GROTE STER. OOK OVER 5 MILJARD JAAR VLIEGEN ALS TWEE GIANT ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELDS HET MELKWEGSTELSEL EN DE ANDROMEDA NEVEL DOOR ELKAAR HEEN OM DOOR ACTIE EN REACTIE 4 TOT 16 MELKWEGSTELSELS OF ANDROMEDA NEVELS ( ZE ZIJN EVEN GROOT) TE VORMEN

“The only chance for survival would be for an advanced civilization to migrate to a new planetary home,” NASA reports.

DE MENS KAN DAT GEGARANDEERD NIET, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MISSCHIEN, MAAR NIET ALS eT GEVOED WORDT DOOR DE ONEINDIGE STUPIDE MENS, SELF DRIVEN ART iFISSIAL INTELLIGENCE

DE EERSTE ZIN HIERONDER GETUIGT VAN DIE ONEINDIGE STUPIDITEIT, probably won't make it out intact ? Een zon die opzwelt tot mars en misschien de 4 gasplaneten in vuur en vlam zet ? Een oneindig stupide journalist die geen feiten kent, net zoals chatgpt een domme achter lijke gelovige, dat kreig je er nou van, de mammon mensvarken in artificial intelligence.

“Recent modeling suggests Earth probably won’t make it out intact,” scientists say. “But even if it does, all of the planets that survive will experience skyrocketing levels of energy from the expanding Sun, bathing their atmospheres and surfaces with intense radiation.”

‘Worst-case scenario’ dodged by 19 feet in near collision of big space debris, lab says

NASA thought it knew source of annual Geminid meteor shower. Turns out, it was wrong

Mysterious ‘sparklers’ appear before solar flares, NASA says. What do they mean?

NASA Releases Details of Organization's UFO Investigation

Cassidy Ward

Mon, September 18, 2023 at 11:23 PM GMT+2·3 min read

Is humanity alone in the vastness of the universe? The best we can really say at this point is that we’re not really sure. We’ve been looking for a while, and as far as we can tell, there’s a lot of wonderful and beautiful things going on out there, but none of it is intelligent. Unless you happen to be reading this from the fictional town of Patience, Colorado and are a character on SYFY's Resident Alien, streaming now on Peacock! In that case, you know that aliens exist because one lives next door.

If you hail from anyplace , the answer regarding our cosmic loneliness isn’t quite as clear. But it’s about to get a lot clearer, if NASA has anything to say about it. Recently, the space agency released the first report from its in-house team of UFO investigators.

NASA’s Independent UFO Panel

UFO Flying Low Photo: Bettmann/Getty Images

NASA commissioned an independent panel of experts back in 2022, with the goal of understanding the current UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, previously known as UFOs) landscape and providing insight and recommendations for the future.

The fifteen-person panel is made up of astronomers and scientists from a number of universities and organizations, as well as a representative from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and retired astronaut Captain Scott Kelly. They found no evidence of extraterrestrial origin in any existing UAP reports, but they note that there are many which remain unexplained.

“The top takeaway from the study is that there is a lot more to learn. The NASA independent study team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin, but we don't know what these UAP are,” NASA administrator Bill Nelson said during a press briefing, via Space.

Perhaps more importantly, they identify a number of existing challenges in the study of UAPs and provide recommendations for how to address them, in the hope that we might be able to better explain these phenomena in the future.

Challenges include resolution limits of existing sensors, including orbiting satellites, and an overall lack of data. In short, UAP reports are sparse and the few reports we do have lack good information to investigate. In most cases, the best anyone can do is shrug their shoulders. The panel also notes that part of what drives a lack of good data is the stigma surrounding the topic of UAPs. Part of solving the UAP question involves eliminating the stigma around reporting and discussing it.

How You Can Help Study UFOs

A flying triangle floating above the countryside at night.

Triangle UFO Photo: David Wall/Getty Images

The panel’s overriding philosophy can be found in the report’s opening line, “The study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) presents a unique scientific opportunity that demands a rigorous, evidence-based approach.” To that end, the panel recommends a government-wide approach to UAP data acquisition within which NASA will play a key role.

The idea being that NASA’s overt involvement in the study of UAPs will help to reduce stigma and increase reporting. They also note that artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are likely critical tools for sifting through large data sets in search of anomalies. But before we can set them loose, we need a lot more data. With regard to UAPs, NASA is saying that if you see something, you should say something.

Of course, if you do see something you can’t explain, there is no standardized process for reporting the incident. When you have an ill-defined reporting process and a weighty public stigma around reporting, you’re bound to get far fewer reports than you otherwise would. Which is why the panel recommends robust crowdsourcing of sightings from the public by way of a smartphone app which could collect images and metadata from witnesses all over the world.

In essence, the panel didn’t reveal any striking new answers, but they did uncover the harsh reality that we’re not even equipped to tackle the question of UAPs… yet.

Catch up on the first two seasons of Resident Alien, streaming now on Peacock!